Vision

Vision:
Your Future with DrPaper

Join The Revolution

Introduction

This article was created as part of the DrPaper project and aims to connect with those who want to be part of the revolution that will accelerate scientific progress – anyone can join the project and support its development (see the section “Call to Action – Join the Revolution” for more details).

Mission

We’re building a global marketplace that helps scientists, universities, and publishers save time and reduce costs by streamlining routine tasks and accelerating workflows by up to 60x.

 

Jump to

Scientist of the Future
Publisher of the Future
University of the Future
Join The Revolution

Scientist of the Future

Upon entering the DrPaper platform, a researcher:

  1. Sees an organized profile, automatically generated from article databases – no more manually filling forms. They can also add information about their passions, work style, dreams, and values.
  2. Analyzes their talents and limitations using psychological tools – supporting personal development and enhancing scientific collaboration.
  3. Forms virtual research teams, discussion forums, and projects – based on global matching of competencies, ambitions, and work styles. The system recommends the best connections.
  4. Receives information instead of searching for it – grants, conferences, people, equipment, events. The system works in the background, constantly searching for the best matches to their goals.
  5. Writes and publishes a scientific article in one place – integrated databases, automatic creation of references and citations, contextual literature searches, and certification of content originality.
  6. Finds the right journal – the system analyzes the article topic and suggests the best match in terms of subject matter, impact factor, availability, and publication time.
  7. Submits articles for review without frustration – the file is automatically formatted according to the selected journal’s requirements, and the submission process happens via a modern, intuitive interface.

On the DrPaper platform, the researcher becomes the central manager of their personal and scientific development. They have all the necessary information at hand, engage in international collaboration, and the common barriers and obstacles are removed by technology.

Publisher of the Future

On the DrPaper platform, a publisher:

  1. Uses contextual matching of articles and journals – the platform supports thematic matching of articles to journals before the review stage, reducing the number of mismatched submissions.
  2. Saves time and resources finding reviewers – the system connects journals with researchers based on article content and declared interests, eliminating mass, untargeted email requests.
  3. Receives reviewer applications – researchers can apply to review specific works or journals with one click directly on the platform.
  4. Supports high efficiency in the article review process – the reviewer panel provides access to sources, data, analyses, and recommendations based on similar works, and simplifies communication with authors.
  5. Improves communication with authors – comments and changes can be made directly in the system, without the need to send files back and forth.
  6. Provides language correction in any language – the platform improves article style and language, regardless of the language version.
  7. Automates formatting and publication layout – even small publishers can now use professional technology that automates formatting and publishing according to their standards and publishing cycles, saving days of work per issue.
  8. Gains a unique visual identity – each journal has its space, brand, and mission presented in a standardized space.
  9. Increases global visibility – the platform opens small and medium publishers to the global market, boosting their publishing reach.

Thanks to the DrPaper platform, publishers save time and resources, maintain the highest standards of review quality, streamline internal processes, shorten publication times, and increase global market recognition.

University of the Future

On the DrPaper platform, a university can:

  1. Increase international and multidisciplinary collaboration – through global library consortia and recommendations for connections with other universities, allowing joint journal subscription purchases and cost reduction.
  2. Optimize research processes – by implementing project planning tools based on best business practices, increasing researcher efficiency, and reducing time spent on management.
  3. Connect science with business – through an open collaboration system where researchers can recruit industry experts and form project teams, enabling the fast introduction of a business approach in research.
  4. Analyze university development trends – using reports based on publication, grant, and international collaboration forecasts, allowing better prediction of evaluation outcomes and funding opportunities.
  5. Facilitate knowledge and skills exchange – through a university profile presenting data on research and scientists’ specializations, enabling rapid connections with businesses and other universities.
  6. Invite businesses to engage in future workforce education – through a feature that allows inviting business representatives to collaborate on curriculum development and conduct courses, supporting long-term talent recruitment.
  7. Adapt educational offerings to labor market needs – by analyzing business inquiries about competencies and R&D projects, enabling universities to dynamically adjust programs to real market needs.

With DrPaper, universities gain full insight into their resources, project progress, and predictions of events affecting their funding and development. The global aggregation of university resources supports collaboration with researchers, students, businesses, government organizations, and other universities.

Problems Solved by DrPaper

Scintists’ Challenges

  • Difficulty in selecting the right journal for publication (Ali, 2010; Welch, 2012)
  • Rejection of articles due to formal and formatting issues (Bradbury, 2012; CORREIA, 2020; Greiff & Ziegler, 2017; Teixeira da Silva & Nazarovets, 2025)
  • Barriers in establishing scientific collaborations (Vaez – Alaei et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2024)
  • Difficulties in managing research projects efficiently (Chernogorova et al., 2021; SLAEAT, 2024)
  • Lengthy peer review and publication processes (Aczel et al., 2021; Dance, 2023; Horta & Jung, 2024; Powell, 2016)

Publishers’ Challenges

  • Shortage of available reviewers (Aczel et al., 2025)
  • Time – consuming peer review process and challenges in maintaining high review quality (Aczel et al., 2021; Dance, 2023; Horta & Jung, 2024; Powell, 2016)
  • Lack of automation in internal publishing workflows (Riding, 2022)
  • Low visibility and citation impact of journal publications (Schilhan et al., 2021; Wallace et al., 2021; You et al., 2022)

Universities’ Challenges

  • Bridging the gap between academia and industry (Rossoni et al., 2024a; University – Industry Collaboration, 2019)
  • Difficulty in establishing collaborations with other institutions (Fabius & Krogan, 2021; Hedges et al., 2021; Rossoni et al., 2024b; Yao, 2021)
  • High costs of journal subscriptions (Butler et al., 2023; Shu et al., 2018)
  • Lack of data for strategic planning and forecasting (Biondi & Russo, 2022)
  • Mismatch between academic programs and labor market needs (Achtenhagen & Achtenhagen, 2019; Pholphirul, 2017; Verhoef et al., 2021)

Call to Action: Join the Revolution

DrPaper is more than a platform  –  it’s a movement to accelerate science globally. We invite investors, researchers, publishers, universities, and anyone passionate about shaping the future of research to join us.

 

Scientist  –  you are at the center of the scientific galaxy!

If you believe DrPaper should exist, here’s how you can help:

  • Vote for the project
    Every vote counts—it shows investors there’s real demand. We’ll email you once we’re funded.

Vote for DrPaper!

  • Spread the word: Know someone who’d love DrPaper? Share this page with them

Small and medium publishers  –  join our Partner Program

Together, let’s open a new chapter in the history of scientific publishing:

  • From days to minutes
    Fully automated typesetting of entire journal issues ready for publication.
  • From templates to style
    Modern graphic design and a unique character for each journal.
  • From anonymity to visibility
    Be present on a platform connecting scientists and editorial teams from around the world.

How to start?

The first step is easy –  let’s meet. It’s the beginning of our shared journey into the future, where we save your time and invest it in growing your publishing brand

Let's talk

Investors wanted  –  without you, it’s impossible

We are gathering a group of investors willing to support the DrPaper project. You can join the first funding round until the end of June 2025. The goal is to raise 250,000 PLN, with a minimum ticket of 50,000 PLN.

The second funding round will run from July to the end of November 2025, with the amount and ticket size to be determined based on the response to this article and the project’s development stage.

We invite you to get in touch and start the conversation  –  we’ll be happy to answer all your questions and present our pitch deck, business plan, and additional materials.

Let's talk

Everyone can help

At this stage of the project, we are looking for both financial and strategic support.

Not an investor, but want to become a partner?

We offer the possibility of entering into a minimum two – year collaboration leading to co – ownership of the company.

We are looking for people with expertise in:

  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • UX Design
  • Programming (solid knowledge of JS, TypeScript, NodeJS, and LaTeX)

We are open to discussions, brainstorming, and your suggestions.

If you have ideas on how we can further improve the scientific world or explore other ways to collaborate  –  reach out to us.

Let's talk

References

Achtenhagen, C., & Achtenhagen, L. (2019). The impact of digital technologies on vocational education and training needs. Education + Training, 61(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2018-0119

Aczel, B., Barwich, A.-S., Diekman, A. B., Fishbach, A., Goldstone, R. L., Gomez, P., Gundersen, O. E., von Hippel, P. T., Holcombe, A. O., Lewandowsky, S., Nozari, N., Pestilli, F., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2025). The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(5). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401232121

Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., & Holcombe, A. O. (2021). A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 6(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-021-00118-2

Ali, J. (2010). Manuscript Rejection: Causes and Remedies. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 2(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.62205

Biondi, L., & Russo, S. (2022). Integrating strategic planning and performance management in universities: a multiple case-study analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(2), 417–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09628-7

Bradbury, M. E. (2012). Why you don’t get published: an editor’s view. Accounting & Finance, 52(2), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2012.00473.x

Butler, L.-A., Matthias, L., Simard, M.-A., Mongeon, P., & Haustein, S. (2023). The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272

Chernogorova, Y., Bliznakov, Z., & Bliznakova, K. (2021). MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES IN IMPLEMENTING SCIENTIFIC PROJECTS DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 23(1), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2021.23.1.09

CORREIA, M. I. T. D. (2020). A series of editorials regarding the question: why is my paper rejected? Revista Do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, 47. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-2020edit01

Dance, A. (2023). Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off. Nature, 614(7948), 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00403-8

Fabius, J. M., & Krogan, N. J. (2021). Creating collaboration by breaking down scientific barriers. Cell, 184(9), 2271–2275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.022

Greiff, S., & Ziegler, M. (2017). How to Make Sure Your Paper is Desk Rejected. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(2), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000419

Hedges, J. R., Soliman, K. F. A., Southerland, W. M., D’Amour, G., Fernández-Repollet, E., Khan, S. A., Kumar, D., Shikuma, C. M., Rivers, B. M., Yates, C. C., Yanagihara, R., Thompson, W. E., Bond, V. C., Harris-Hooker, S., McClure, S. A., & Ofili, E. O. (2021). Strengthening and Sustaining Inter-Institutional Research Collaborations and Partnerships. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2727. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052727

Horta, H., & Jung, J. (2024). The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science. Higher Education Quarterly, 78(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12511

Pholphirul, P. (2017). Educational mismatches and labor market outcomes. Education + Training, 59(5), 534–546. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2016-0173

Powell, K. (2016). Does it take too long to publish research? Nature, 530(7589), 148–151. https://doi.org/10.1038/530148a

Riding, J. B. (2022). The trials and tribulations of formatting (and reformatting) manuscripts. Palynology, 46(2), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2021.2020452

Rossoni, A. L., de Vasconcellos, E. P. G., & de Castilho Rossoni, R. L. (2024a). Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly, 74(3), 1841–1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1

Rossoni, A. L., de Vasconcellos, E. P. G., & de Castilho Rossoni, R. L. (2024b). Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly, 74(3), 1841–1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1

Schilhan, L., Kaier, C., & Lackner, K. (2021). Increasing visibility and discoverability of scholarly publications with academic search engine optimization. Insights the UKSG Journal, 34. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.534

Shu, F., Mongeon, P., Haustein, S., Siler, K., Alperin, J., & Larivière, V. (2018). Is It Such a Big Deal? On the Cost of Journal Use in the Digital Era. College & Research Libraries, 79(6), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.6.785

SLAEAT, F. (2024). The impact of poor planning on the duration and cost of the projects. Mesopotamian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2024, 60–81. https://doi.org/10.58496/MJCE/2024/009

Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, M. (2025). Rejected papers in academic publishing: Turning negatives into positives to maximize paper acceptance. Learned Publishing, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1649

University-Industry Collaboration. (2019). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/e9c1e648-en

Vaez-Alaei, M., Deniaud, I., Marmier, F., Gourc, D., & Cowan, R. (2022). A partner selection framework for strategic alliances based on project complexity and partner’s past experience. Enterprise Information Systems, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2021.1889038

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Wallace, W. S., Hatch, G., & Soehner, C. (2021). Measuring the impact of a library-hosted showcase event. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102428

Welch, S. J. (2012). Selecting the right journal for your submission. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 4(3), 336–338. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.05.06

Yao, B. (2021). International Research Collaboration: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 37(2), 107–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756479320976130

You, T., Park, J., Lee, J. Y., Yun, J., & Jung, W.-S. (2022). Disturbance of questionable publishing to academia. Journal of Informetrics, 16(2), 101294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2022.101294

Contact

Let’s talk! We’ll be happy to answer any questions and get to know you better:

Mail: contact@drpaper.ai

LinkedIn: Anna Gorzkiewicz, CEO Brainiverse sp. z o.o.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/anna – gorzkiewicz – ai/

 

Meet our team: https://drpaper.ai/creators/

 

The DrPaper project is owned by the Polish company Brainiverse sp. z o.o., headquartered in Łódź.

The Future of Scientific Collaboration

Virtual Research Teams

Create and manage international research teams with tools specifically designed for scientific collaboration.

Smart Journal Recommendations

AI-powered system that analyzes your article content and suggests best matching journals for publication.

Supported Literature Review

Integrated research databases with contextual search to simplify gathering and citing relevant publications.

One-Click Submission

Submit your perfectly formatted articles to journals with a single click, eliminating complex submission processes.

Publication Tracking

Track the status of your submissions across different journals from a single dashboard.

Peer Communication

Connect with peers who share research interests or have complementary expertise to your own.

Key Benefits for Scientists

Our platform is built to support scientists in their core mission
by removing barriers to research and publication.

Save Valuable Time

Automated formatting and submission processes save scientists an average of 5 hours per article, freeing time for actual research.

Global Collaboration

Connect with researchers worldwide who complement your expertise, creating powerful research networks.

Increased Publication Success

Smart journal recommendations and formatting increase acceptance rates by matching papers with the most appropriate venues.

Reduced Administrative Work

Automation of repetitive tasks associated with research administration and publication frees mental energy for discovery.